Ready for the future? App ideas to create using ChatGPT in 2023

Many creative agencies operate in a constant state of barely organized chaos. Barrages of client requests, constant revision loops, scattered messages across multiple platforms -- it can cost a lot in terms of time, energy, and money. Missed deadlines, duplicated work, scope creep and frustrated clients can often follow. But those frustrated customers are often merely symptoms of a bigger problem: the lack of a unified system to deal with all these disparate elements. The answer? A well-configured service desk system. A good service desk doesn't just facilitate and streamline support -- it becomes the operational backbone of your agency. With the right setup, you can wrangle that chaos into an efficient, smooth-running machine that generates satisfied customers and happier teams. With that in mind, here are 10 service desk efficiency hacks every creative agency should be using -- but most aren't. 1. Automating Repetitive Tasks Macros and triggers are two of the most powerful automation tools in existence, and many creative agencies don't make good use of them. Instead, they answer the same questions, send the same reminders, over and over. Setting up pre-written replies to common queries and triggers to automatically route certain types of communication (bug reports, revision requests) to the right people can be a godsend. You can also use automation to add tags, set priorities, and assign tasks without anyone having to do anything. 2. Using AI-Powered Ticket Triage Simply put, email threads are where high-priority threads go to die. The chances of something getting lost or missed is far too high. By using AI-powered triage, you can avoid this issue. AI-enabled service desk software can categorize and prioritize incoming requests instantly, fast-tracking time-sensitive issues and putting lower-priority items further down the queue where they belong. That was, nothing important slips through the cracks. 3. Building a Searchable Knowledge Base One of the great perks of a service desk system is how much work it can save you -- but only if you build it up correctly. By having a searchable knowledge base on hand, you can put all your creative guidelines, process docs, technical templates, and workflow instructions in one place, so no one has to ask where they are. 4. Implementing Self-Service Portals Likewise, you can use your service desk to reduce repetitive and simple questions from clients. A self-service portals lets your clients submit briefs, request revisions, download assets, check project status, and review communications all on their own without having to call or email. This saves time and reduces workload, and everyone gets fewer emails: win-win. 5. Standardizing Workflows One of the biggest sources of friction between clients and creative teams is the lack of standardization. Integrating service-level agreements (SLAs) and escalation rules help create the necessary consistency and transparency to avoid the worst of this. Set SLAs for such things as revision turnaround times, approval deadlines, and delivery estimates. Pair those with escalation rules that automatically alert account managers when deadlines approach. This does a lot to keep everyone on the same page. 6. Consolidating Communication into One Platform Creative agencies are often juggling a multitude of communications channels (email, Slack, Teams, etc.) This can easily lead to lost messages and duplicated work -- and the aforementioned chaos ensues. By consolidating everything into one unified platform -- your service desk -- you can view those conversations all on a single dashboard, saving yourself a lot of headache. 7. Using Tags and Categorization Tags are one of the most useful and essential features in service desk software, and yet they're also one of the most underused. Categorizing your tickets by client, department, project type, priority or revision count is one of the most powerful things you can do for your efficiency. It gives you valuable data you can use to refine processes, improve onboarding, and make pricing or staffing decisions. 8. Introducing Automated Follow-Ups Every creative who works professionally likely knows the pain of chasing down a client to try to get approvals or missing-but-necessary assets. Once again, this is where automation comes to the rescue. You can use automation to send reminders when clients need to approve artwork or deliver assets, and trigger a friendly "closure" message after the issue is resolved. This keeps communication flowing without the constant need for awkward nudging. 9. Integrating PM Tools and Service Desk Software Ideally, your service desk software shouldn't exist in a vacuum. By integrating it with a project management tool like Trello, Monday, or some other PM software, you can ensure that every incoming request or query becomes a trackable task. This improves collaboration between your writers, designers, editors, and developers, and ensures everyone sees the same deadlines and project priorities. 10. Review Analytics Weekly One of the best ways to avoid problems is to see them coming rather than merely reacting to them. A properly configured service desk will gather all sorts of metrics, from average response time and revision volume to top clients and bottleneck stages. By reviewing these metrics weekly, you can glean insights to help you resolve issues before they become a major concern.

Outsourcing product design can be a smart move for a startup. It offers access to talent, speed, flexibility. But only if you ask the right questions. Because if you skip key checks you may wind up with mismatches, hidden costs or a product that doesn’t match your vision. Here are ten questions every startup should ask before handing over product design to a third-party partner, along with why they matter and what good answers look like. 1. What’s your experience in designing products for companies like ours? You want a design partner who has done similar work, maybe in your industry, maybe with similar constraints (budget, time-to-market, regulations). The question is rooted in the old principle: has this team walked a mile in your shoes? If the partner hesitates or gives only generic examples, that is a red flag.  2. Can you show me case studies and references? Seeing proof gives you confidence. You should ask for past projects, ideally ones where the outcome and the challenges are similar to yours. Did they solve a tricky problem? How did they measure success? If you don’t receive concrete examples, you’re dealing blind.  3. What is your process for product design from brief to finished product? Outsourcing isn’t just “hand off and hope”. A good partner will explain their approach: research, ideation, prototyping, user testing, iteration. Understanding this tells you how the collaboration will play out and whether it fits your rhythm.  4. Who will be working on our project and how dedicated are they? Know the team. Are you getting juniors or seniors? Is the same team working each phase or will it change hands? Startups often suffer when the “real experts” are elsewhere. Asking this helps you gauge commitment and continuity.  5. How will we manage communication, feedback and decision-making? Mis-alignment often comes from weak communication, especially when outsourcing. Clarify the cadence of check-ins, methods of feedback, escalation paths. Ask how time-zones, culture differences or remote work setups are handled if they apply.  6. What about intellectual property, confidentiality and ownership? When you outsource product design, you’re often sharing your ideas, concepts, maybe early prototypes. Make sure there’s clarity around IP ownership, confidentiality, what happens if the relationship ends. You don’t want surprises later. 7. How do you handle prototyping, testing and iteration? Product design doesn’t end at “looks good”. You’ll want to know: how many prototypes will we see? Will testing with real users or scenarios be done? What happens after feedback? A partner that treats design as a one-off deliverable may leave you stranded.  8. How flexible are you with scope, changes and future development? Startups change fast. Your product may pivot, features may shift, timelines may move. It’s helpful to work with a design partner who knows this and builds in agility. If they insist on rigid contracts and no changes, you could end up constrained.  9. What are the costs, pricing model and hidden charges? Outsourcing is often pitched as a cheaper route but only if you understand what's included. Ask for a breakdown, for payment tied to milestones, for clarity on what happens if things go beyond scope. Don’t assume everything is “included”.  10. What happens after the design phase - support, handover, long-term maintenance? Designing the product is one thing; handing it over, ensuring it works with your team, supporting future iterations is another. If your partner disappears once the files are delivered, you may face gaps. A good partner will plan for handover, documentation and future support.  Connecting This Back to Startups For startups especially, outsourcing product design can be a game-changer. You may not have the in-house team, the infrastructure or the time to build everything internally. Outsourcing lets you access specialised skills and launch faster.  But remember: it is not a magic shortcut. You still need to steer direction, align strategy and stay involved. Asking the ten questions above ensures you pick a partner who supports your vision and adapts to your pace. How RightFirms Supports You At RightFirms, we work with startups to connect them with trusted service providers. If you’re looking for product design outsourcing partners, we help you sort through options, verify experience, and make smart choices. Our review-based listings emphasise transparency and legitimacy, so you find providers who answer the right questions and who have proof. Final Thoughts Outsourcing product design can accelerate your startup’s journey. But like all critical decisions, it requires due diligence. By asking the questions above you put yourself in a stronger position to succeed. You reduce risk, align expectations and choose partners who see your product as their priority too. Selecting the right design partner is not an afterthought. It’s part of your strategy. Make it count.

Deciding whether to build an in-house team or hire an external agency is one of the most important strategic choices a SaaS startup makes. The right decision affects speed, cost, scalability, and ultimately your return on investment (ROI). While many founders ask “Should we bring marketing, demand-gen, or growth in-house or go agency?” the clearer answer often lies in the numbers and business stage. In this guide, we’ll walk through the data and qualitative factors that SaaS startups should weigh when comparing agency vs in-house. We will cover cost comparisons, speed to results, expertise and scale. At the end you’ll have a framework to decide what may offer the strongest ROI for your current stage. Why ROI Matters in SaaS Early-Growth For SaaS startups, every dollar spent needs to show impact, and quickly. Investors, boards, and founders alike monitor metrics such as cost per acquisition (CPA), lifetime value (LTV), churn rate, and growth velocity. Marketing or growth spend that doesn’t deliver compounds the risk. A recurring finding: startups that outsource marketing or demand generation to a specialist agency often report higher ROI than those building from scratch in-house. For instance, one article cites that businesses outsourcing part of their marketing saw “43% higher ROI” than those handling everything in-house. Another study suggested agencies deliver faster time to market, access to specialised skills, and capability to scale up quickly.  Given this, it’s less about “agency good vs in-house good” and more about “which approach offers the best fit for your stage, budget, goals and risk appetite?” Comparing the Costs: Agency vs In-House 1. In-House Model: Building a full in-house growth or marketing team involves not just salaries. You must factor in recruitment cost, onboarding, training, tools & tech stack, employee benefits, time to productivity, and ongoing management overhead. A startup might hire a growth lead, content specialist, paid-media manager and data/analytics resource. The recruitment alone can take weeks or months. 2. Agency Model: Hiring an agency offers a different cost model: you typically engage a team with existing proven systems, tools and workflows. The incremental cost is often predictable monthly retainer or project fee without many of the fixed costs of full-time employees (benefits, infrastructure, long ramp-up). Many startups benefit from faster ramp and quicker access to specialist expertise. 3. Cost vs Value: The real question is not just “which costs less” but “which delivers more value for that spend”. One SaaS-oriented agency article mentions that an agency might cost $120k/year yet deliver $1m in revenue, a far better return than a single in-house hire with limited scope. For a SaaS startup, this means: if you hire an agency that can accelerate lead acquisition, refine funnel conversion and help scale trial-to-paid conversions, the ROI equation may favour agency in early or scaling phases. Speed, Expertise and Scale: Key ROI Levers 1. Speed to Market: Agencies often have established processes, tools and specialists on hand, meaning a quicker launch of campaigns or growth initiatives. In-house teams require hiring, alignment, ramp-up, and iteration. Delays cost money especially in SaaS where early traction matters. 2. Access to Expertise: In-house you may get strong alignment and integration with your product, but you risk skill-gaps (e.g., SEO, paid media, analytics, funnel optimisation). An agency often brings a full stack of skills, cross-industry experience and optimisation frameworks. 3. Scalability and Flexibility: As your SaaS startup grows, needs change quickly. Agencies enable you to scale up (or down) spend and resources more easily than hiring or firing staff. If you build in-house too early, you risk over-capacity or being locked into fixed overhead. 4. Control, Brand & Culture: One real trade-off: in-house teams have deeper brand immersion, easier access to product teams and tighter alignment with company culture. If your SaaS product is highly complex, technical or requires deep domain knowledge, this may favour in-house. Data-Driven ROI Comparison (Hypothetical SaaS Scenario) Here’s a simplified example to illustrate the ROI dynamics for a SaaS startup in early scaling phase. ModelAnnual CostProjected Incremental RevenueROI MultipleAgency (retainer)US$150,000US$1,000,000~6.7×In-House TeamUS$250,000*US$800,000~3.2× *Includes salaries + benefits + tools + onboarding. In this scenario the agency model gives higher ROI multiple and faster value generation.Of course your actual numbers will vary – cost of living, your region, your market, complexity of product, sales cycle, etc. The key takeaway is to evaluate both models as investment vehicles, measuring cost versus incremental revenue, not just fixed cost. When In-House Makes More Sense for a SaaS Startup Agencies are strong in early-to-mid growth, but there are times when in-house may be the right long-term choice: You have a long product-roadmap requiring deep product-marketing alignment and continuous content tied to brand narrative. Your SaaS model is very niche, technical, or compliance-heavy, needing internal domain specialists and tight control of messaging. You have stable budget, strong leadership and need deep institutional knowledge built within the team. You’ve already hit maturity and want to shift from growth spurt to optimisation, owning the full marketing engine. A Hybrid Approach: Best of Both Worlds Many SaaS startups adopt a hybrid model: core strategy, brand and product messaging stay in-house, while specialised execution (paid media, content scaling, growth experiments) sits with an agency. This allows you to benefit from speed and expertise whilst building internal capability and brand continuity. How to Evaluate for ROI: Checklist for SaaS Founders Use the following questions to evaluate whether they point you toward agency or in-house: What is our growth stage and urgency? Early traction vs steady growth. What specialist skills do we lack today? If many, agency may close gaps faster. How fast do we need results? The shorter the time to impact, the more agency makes sense. What is our budget and burn-rate tolerance? Can we absorb overhead of team? How brand- and product-specific is our messaging? The more unique, the more in-house may benefit. What is the cost per hire, training time, and ramp-up time of in-house? What results can we demand from an agency? Clear KPIs, incremental revenue, transparency. Why RightFirms Matters in This Decision As a SaaS founder searching for a trusted business listing platform, you’ll also want to evaluate agencies with credibility and transparency. At RightFirms we curate and review agencies so you can see past claims and find partners with proven results. Being able to benchmark agencies, see case studies and compare their performance helps ensure you’re investing for ROI, not just promise. Final Thoughts The question is less whether agencies are better than in-house, and more whether your startup’s stage, capability and budget make one model clearly superior in ROI terms. For many SaaS startups in early or scaling phases, an agency offers faster access to expertise, lower overhead, and quicker time to value. But that does not mean in-house is wrong, it simply means you must understand the full cost, ramp time and strategic implications. If you treat marketing or growth as an investment rather than a cost centre, you frame the decision in terms of returns. Hire the model that drives the highest incremental revenue for your startup right now, with the flexibility to evolve as you grow.